One of the common arguments against getting ones worldly feed from the internet is that it's too self serving, to self centered. Print, it's claimed, has the virtue of serendipity, fortuitous comings-upon of other tangents, contrary info and unforeseen illuminations. . ahem, I'm feeling all 19th century after that spiel! But, if you're not totally nailed by your web rounds and have those open moments, you can fall from one point, to another area, to another universe. I had a great example of that, that I'll try to describe via that file protocol. I see a blurb in the print New Yorker >> I go to the New Yorker web site >> find some links >> go to said links and sources >> hmmmm, interesting >> double back, click another link and wow! In English: there was a mention of a photo exhibit at the Museum of The City New York, I go to that site, look at the artists contributions, go to a particular artist's site, but then double back to the Museum site and see something else! Urban Abstractions, the exhibit only goes to August 2, so you better hustle. I did a quick search to see if a book is available, but didn't see anything. An email will be sent regarding this. . . But from what I see of the images at the site, it's that superb, classic material that really appeals to me. . . at least! You can't go wrong with Edward Steichen and Berenice Abbot (among many others).